Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview of PNP status in PD

From: Large-fiber neuropathy in Parkinson’s disease: a narrative review

Authors

Medication

Samples

Examined nerves

PNP prevalence

Associated findings

Toth et al. [25]

Oral LD

500 PD

Sural, peroneal, tibial

9.8% of PD patients

Hyc/MMA↑ Cumulative LD dose and MMA level were associated with PNP severity

Toth et al. [34]

Oral LD

58 PD, 58 controls

Peroneal, tibial, median, ulnar

55% of PD patients vs. 9% of controls

Age↑, UPDRS scores↑, Hyc/MMA ↑ PNP severity correlated with LD exposure and MMA level

Ceravalo et al. [6]

Oral LD

330 PD, 137 controls

Sural, peroneal

19.40% of PD patients with long LD exposure, 6.80% with short LD exposure, 4.82% with no LD exposure vs. 8.76% of controls

LD dose↑, Hyc↑, vitamin B12↓

Shahrizaila et al. [39]

Oral LD vs LD-naïve

51 PD

Sural, tibial, median, ulnar

23% of LD-treated vs. 24% of LD-naïve PD patients ( ↔)

MMA/Hyc ↔ 

De Araújo et al. [49]

Oral LD

38 PD, 16 PS

Peroneal, tibial, sural

34.2% of PD patients vs. 23.5% of patients with parkinsonism other than PD ( ↔)

EMG abnormalities correlated with age and Hoehn & Yahr stage

Vanta et al. [38]

Oral LD vs LD-naïve

73 PD

sural, peroneal, tibial

67.3% of LD-treated vs. 4.8% of LD-naïve PD patients

Vitamin B12 level correlated with LD daily dose and duration of treatment, LD dose correlated with sural nerve amplitude

Lee and Baik [41]

LD-naïve

105 de novo PD

Median, ulnar, sural, peroneal

22.8% of PD patients PD

Hyc↑

Kühn et al. [7]

Oral LD

50 PD

Tibial, median, sural

62% of PD patients

Motor nerve amplitudes correlate with Hoehn & Yahr stage and UPDRS III score

Mathukumalli et al. [42]

Oral LD

93 PD, 70 controls

median, ulnar, peroneal, tibial, sural

7.53% of PD patients vs. 4.29% in controls ( ↔)

Vitamin B12/Hyc ↔ between cases and controls

Ramachandran et al. [35]

Oral LD

154 PD

median, ulnar, peroneal, tibial, sural

18.2% of PD patients

Disease duration and severity, cumulative LD dose and hcy level were associated with PNP

Corrà et al. [12]

Oral LD

99 PD

Sural, tibial, peroneal, ulnar, radial, median

12.5% of PD patients

Presence of PNP was associated with gait and balance parameters

Jugel et al. [46]

Oral PD medication vs. LCIG

30 PD

median, tibial, sural, peroneal

66.7% of PD patients with oral PD medication vs. 100% LCIG-treated patients

Degree of neuropathic change correlated with weight loss and LD dose in LCIG group

Mancini et al. [44]

Oral LD vs. LCIG vs. non-LD

150 PD

ulnar, peroneal, tibial, sural

28% of LCIG-treated patients vs. 20% with oral LD vs. 6% with non-LD treatment

Vitamin 12↓, folate↓, hcy↑ in LD-treated patients. LD daily dose correlated with Hcy levels

Loens et al. [45]

Oral LD vs. LCIG

21 PD

median, peroneal, tibial, sural

100% of LCIG-treated patients vs. 72.7% with oral LD

Vitamin B12, folate, hyc ↔ LD dose correlated with vitamin B6 deficiency

Kwon et al. [50]

Oral LD

41 PD

tibial, sural, peroneal, median, ulnar, radial

65.85% of PD patients

PNP deteriorated in 21.95% of cases. Median sensory nerve was most affected. Sural nerve amplitude correlated with lower quality of life and worse cognition

  1. LD, levodopa; LCIG, levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel; PS, parkinsonism; Hyc, homocysteine; MMA, methylmalonic acid; UPDRS, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; ↑ elevated; ↓reduced; ↔ not significantly different