Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristic of participants and pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES) intervention and changes in the primary outcome measure at days 5, 9 and 92

From: Clinical predictors of outcome after pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES) in non-stroke related neurogenic dysphagia after mechanical ventilation and tracheotomy: results from subgroup analysis of PHADER study

 

All ventilated non-stroke (n = 57)

Participant characteristics

 

Age

63.6 (15.5)

Sex (Male / Female)

40 (70.2) / 17 (29.8)

Neurological conditions causing dysphagia

 

 Traumatic brain injury

22 (38.6)

 Critical illness polyneuropathy

15 (26.3)

 Hypoxia

3 (5.3)

 Seizures

3 (5.3)

 Encephalitis

2 (3.5)

 Guillain-Barré

2 (3.5)

 Meningitis

2 (3.5)

 Tumour

2 (3.5)

 Brain abscess

1 (1.8)

 Cavernoma

1 (1.8)

 Cerebral oedema

1 (1.8)

 Encephalopathy

1 (1.8)

 Multiple sclerosis

1 (1.8)

 Neurosarcoidosis

1 (1.8)

Feeding status at baseline*

 

 Oral, normal

0 (0.0)

 Oral, supervision

0 (0.0)

 Oral, with support

0 (0.0)

 NGT or NJT

29 (50.9)

 PEG or RIG

26 (45.6)

 Other routes

2 (3.5)

Intervention characteristics

 

PES perceptual threshold at the first session (mA)

15.3 (6.0)

PES stimulation intensity at the first session (mA)

28.8 (8.9)

Time from diagnosis to treatment (days)

51.0 [48.8]

DSRS

 

 Baseline

11.6 (1.2)

 Day 5

10.9 (2.5)

 Day 9

9.1 (3.9)

 Day 92

5.8 (5.1)

  1. Data are presented as mean (standard deviation), number (%) or median [interquartile range].
  2. *Feeding status at baseline was defined according to Woodhouse et al. (2018) [47]
  3. DSRS: dysphagia severity rating scale [30]; NGT: nasogastric tube; NIHSS: National Institute Health Stroke Scale; NJT: nasojejunal tube; PEG: percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube; RIG: radiographically inserted gastrostomy tube